<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CQ WW RTTY Contest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.k2dsl.com/2008/09/29/cq-ww-rtty-contest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.k2dsl.com/2008/09/29/cq-ww-rtty-contest/</link>
	<description>In the chair and on the air...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 22:25:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David, K2DBK</title>
		<link>http://www.k2dsl.com/2008/09/29/cq-ww-rtty-contest/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>David, K2DBK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 03:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.k2dsl.com/?p=60#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Congratulations on your excellent showing in the contest. I operated for around 14 hours and wound up with roughly half of your score with a similar setup. (100w, G5RV). I only really operated on 80m on Friday night, which definitely cost me a bundle, but I just &quot;play&quot; in contests, so that&#039;s OK with me. I was thrilled with my score in any case.

As for the off-time, I believe that the way that N1MM calculates it is by taking a look at the time between QSOs. Once there&#039;s 30 minutes or more, it starts counting that as an off-time. I think there&#039;s no other real way to it to calculate an off-time (though I guess it&#039;d be nice to have a switch), but I think that the idea is that for most contests off-times must be a certain minimum length anyway, so that&#039;s why they do it that way. My time calculations will get messed up especially if I&#039;m just making a few QSOs, stepping away for a few minutes, then coming back, since it&#039;ll show me &quot;active&quot; for more time than I really was. I think the only real way to get a truly accurate time would be to keep a log.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations on your excellent showing in the contest. I operated for around 14 hours and wound up with roughly half of your score with a similar setup. (100w, G5RV). I only really operated on 80m on Friday night, which definitely cost me a bundle, but I just &#8220;play&#8221; in contests, so that&#8217;s OK with me. I was thrilled with my score in any case.</p>
<p>As for the off-time, I believe that the way that N1MM calculates it is by taking a look at the time between QSOs. Once there&#8217;s 30 minutes or more, it starts counting that as an off-time. I think there&#8217;s no other real way to it to calculate an off-time (though I guess it&#8217;d be nice to have a switch), but I think that the idea is that for most contests off-times must be a certain minimum length anyway, so that&#8217;s why they do it that way. My time calculations will get messed up especially if I&#8217;m just making a few QSOs, stepping away for a few minutes, then coming back, since it&#8217;ll show me &#8220;active&#8221; for more time than I really was. I think the only real way to get a truly accurate time would be to keep a log.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

